All health practitioners would be well aware of their requirements to obtain informed consent from their patients before assessment or treatment takes place.  However, Guild Insurance’s vast experience in managing claims made against health practitioners has highlighted that many practitioners don’t meet all their informed consent requirements.

What is informed consent?

There is an explanation about informed consent in the Code of Conduct for each of the professions regulated by AHPRA.  In this document, informed consent is defined as ‘a person’s voluntary decision about healthcare that is made with knowledge and understanding of the benefits and risks involved’.  This statement highlights the difference between consent and informed consent.  If a patient hasn’t been made aware of the benefits and risks, their consent isn’t informed.

Informed consent isn’t just required for treatment. Depending on the nature of the healthcare being provided, informed consent should also be obtained for assessment. 

Informed consent and insurance claims

Informed consent can feature in insurance claims against practitioners in a couple of ways.

It’s not uncommon when a patient is unhappy following treatment for them to allege they weren’t made aware of the risks when they consented to treatment.  Quite often they will allege the treatment was negligent and has resulted in harm or suffering.  They then add that had they been informed of the possible risks, they wouldn’t have consented.

In other cases, patients may not make any allegation about consent, their complaint might solely focus on the clinical outcome, yet when their claim is being managed it’s found that they didn’t give their informed consent prior to treatment being provided.  When this occurs, it makes it challenging for Guild to prove that the practitioner has treated appropriately and met their requirements.

The informed consent conversation

Informed consent requires a conversation between the treating practitioner and the patient.  This conversation needs to occur prior to assessment and treatment. 

The conversation must:

• detail the recommended assessment and treatment as well as alternate treatment options
• include the expected benefits of that treatment
• provide information about the risks of the treatment
• allow time for the patient to ask questions
• be held in language which can be understood by the patient which means practitioners should avoid technical clinical language.
• take place in a private area where the patient will feel comfortable being open and honest about their health situation.
• be tailored to that individual patient and their unique clinical needs

Recording informed consent

It’s imperative that practitioners make a note in the clinical record regarding the patient providing their informed consent.  This needs to be more than ‘IC given’.  The record needs to show what treatment options and risks were discussed as well as any questions asked by the patient.  The record should also show what the patient consented to as well as what they didn’t consent to where relevant.

The informed consent form

One area which leads to some confusion about informed consent is how to use an informed consent form.  Having a patient sign a form is seen as a quick and simplified way of having a patient provide their informed consent and keeping a record of that.  However, they are unfortunately too often used inappropriately. 

Signed forms aren’t a requirement.  While recording consent is required, this doesn’t need to be done using a form.  Notes in the clinical record are sufficient.  However, signed forms do provide additional evidence if there is an allegation that informed consent wasn’t given.

Forms can’t be used to replace the informed consent conversation.  A patient can not read a form and gain the same level of understanding as they would from a conversation with the practitioner.  Nor can they ask questions of the form. 

A form should only be signed after the conversation with the practitioner has been had and the patient understands what it is they’re consenting to.  Patients are occasionally asked to sign consent forms at reception before they’ve seen the practitioner.  As there has been no assessment or discussion about treatment at this stage, this can’t be considered informed consent as the patient hasn’t been informed.

Some practices combine new patient forms with the consent form.  This isn’t ideal as the two forms serve different purposes.  Also, having them on the one form encourages patients to sign the consent form at reception before they’ve seen the practitioner.  Therefore, they should be divided into two separate forms.

Informed consent is not a one-off event

Practitioners regularly ask how often their patients need to give informed consent.  There is no set time frame for when informed consent conversations or signed forms need to be repeated.  The requirement is that when a patient is receiving any assessment or treatment, they need to have given their informed consent to this.  Therefore, informed consent should be an ongoing process; it’s a continual conversation with patients during consultations.  And when there is any change in the treatment being provided, or if the patient has returned following a period of absence, informed consent needs to be revisited.  A general ‘consent to all treatment’ for the life of the therapeutic relationship is not appropriate.

Informed financial consent

As well as consenting to assessment and treatment, patients should also give their informed financial consent.  This means they need to be provided with information about the expected cost of treatment before this treatment commences.

In summary…

There is no one right way to undertake an informed consent conversation and process.  Practitioners must adapt what’s discussed for the patient they’re treating and that patient’s unique circumstances.  However, what must occur in all cases is that the patient is informed of and understands the proposed treatment, alternate treatment options and the risks involved.  Only with this information can they give their informed consent.  The practitioner must also be sure to make a record of this informed consent discussion in the clinical record.

Get a Quote with Guild Insurance today.

Listen or download (mp3) the audio reading of this article, brought to you by Guild Insurance

Listen via Youtube or Audio Player

It’s well recognised that patients don’t necessarily complain simply based on their clinical outcome. Most dentists will have heard of or seen situations where a patient has experienced an outcome which wasn’t ideal yet wasn’t particularly poor, however the patient has been quite annoyed with the outcome and has lodged a complaint.  On the other hand, there are many cases of patients who have experienced quite poor outcomes yet have chosen to not complain.

There are many reasons why the above may occur, some which are easier to identify than others. All patients are different and human behaviour isn’t always predictable.  Good communication and the relationship between the patient and dentist will greatly influence the likelihood of a complaint.  One other very important factor is the expectations of patients.

Patient expectations

Many patients will go into dental appointments with some level of expectation regarding their likely outcome. They may have a very clear and detailed outcome in mind or it may be more broad and open.  Most importantly, some of these expectations will be realistic, however others won’t be.

Unrealistic patient expectations pose very real challenges for dentists. If a patient undergoes treatment which they have unrealistic expectations about, it’s unlikely those expectations are going to be met simply due to them being unrealistic.  If a patient’s expectations haven’t been met, it’s likely the patient is going to be unhappy or dissatisfied with the treatment.  Those unhappy and dissatisfied patients are the ones more likely to complain about the treatment and expect further corrective treatment or compensation.  It’s therefore vital that dentists do all they can to help the patient fully understand treatment and the likely and possible treatment outcomes before treatment begins.

Creating realistic expectations

A key step in making sure a patient has realistic outcomes regarding treatment is to have an open and honest conversation with them. This will not only provide the patient with further information about their treatment, but will also give the dentist a clearer understanding of the patient’s expectations.  A dentist’s clinical skills are vital to what they do, however effective communication goes a long way in providing positive outcomes.

To assist a patient to have realistic expectations, dentists must ensure they explain the treatment and outcomes using simple, clear terms. Technical clinical language should be avoided as many patients won’t understand this.  Dentists should also consider how they tailor their language and the information for each individual patient.  For example, a person with language or literacy challenges may need information presented in a more detailed manner than other patients.  Dentists should also consider using diagrams, pictures or models to assist with understanding where appropriate.

When discussing treatment with a patient, it’s important that dentists don’t make assumptions about what the patient will or won’t understand. It’s easy for dentists to become so familiar with what they do and know that they sometimes forget how foreign that knowledge can be to other people.  Patients will have varying degrees of knowledge and experience regarding dental treatment.  Therefore, what they understand about their treatment will also vary.

When a patient attends a dental clinic and requests a particular form of treatment, this is an occasion when a dentist should be especially mindful of the patient’s expected outcome. When a patient has requested a form of treatment, the patient has clearly formed a decision around what treatment they need to get the outcome they desire.  What they’re requesting and expecting may be reasonable and realistic, however in some cases it may not be.  When presented with this situation, dentists need to be sure they don’t rush into providing the patient with the requested treatment.  As with all patients, there needs to be a thorough assessment and diagnosis process.  Then the patient is to be provided with their treatment options, as well as the risks and benefits of those options.  There may be treatment options which are more suitable for that patient which the patient isn’t aware of.  The patient also needs to be made aware of the likely treatment outcomes for each of those treatment options.

The dentist needs to be sure the patient has all required information before consenting to treatment and this includes understanding the likely outcomes. A patient requesting particular treatment doesn’t alter this required process.  And dentists need to remember that they’re always responsible for the treatment they’ve provided, regardless of whether it was requested by a patient.

In summary…

Dentists should be doing all they realistically can to improve the outcomes for their patients and reduce the likelihood of poor outcomes and complaints. An important step in this process is making sure patients have realistic expectations regarding treatment outcomes.  Dentists have a very important role in using their clinical knowledge in conjunction with practical terminology to assist patients to develop realistic expectations.  Dentists need to remember this is of great benefit to both themselves and their patients.

Get a Quote with Guild Insurance today.

When considering an insurance policy, it’s easy for many of us to think “it’ll never happen to me”.  However, the vast experience of Guild Insurance tells us ‘it’, being events that require insurance claims, unfortunately can happen to people like you. 

Guild Insurance is dedicated to providing risk management information to those insured with us to help reduce the likelihood of events occurring which will have a detrimental impact on their business and lead to an insurance claim.  However, we also know that not everything can be prevented.  Which is why business owners also need to consider what they can do to reduce the severity or impact on their business should an event occur.  And this is where asset registers become so important.

What is an asset register?

An asset register is simply a list of assets held by a business.  These can be created and stored in various ways, such as paper format or electronically, yet should always be stored safely and be easily accessible.

Why are they needed?

All businesses should hold an asset register as they serve a number of important purposes.

It’s estimated that well over half of Australian businesses are underinsured.  A detailed asset register will help a business understand the value of what they own and therefore the level of insurance required to be adequately protected.

An asset register also assists businesses when there is a need to lodge an insurance claim due to property loss or damage.  When there is an up to date asset register, this necessary information can be provided quickly to an insurance company which is likely to speed up the settlement process.  Making an insurance claim for property damage or loss can be quite a stressful process for any business.  An asset register can reduce some of this stress by making the process more straightforward.

When a business has multiple sites, keeping track of all assets is quite a challenge.  An asset register provides the business with a way to manage all assets, even when the assets aren’t physically in sight of those responsible.

What information should be included?

For an asset register to be of any benefit to a business, it’s important that the information is up to date and correct.  Businesses should have a process for how and when the register will be updated and by who.  This process should require adding a new asset as soon as it is purchased.  However, it would also be beneficial doing regular checks of the asset register to be sure nothing has been accidentally left off.

The asset register should include a list of all items which could be lost or damaged if there was an incident at the premises.  Don’t just focus on the costly items; damage to a lot of items which are of lesser value can still add up and you will want a record of these items.  The types of assets to be recorded may include:

• Furniture, both indoor and outdoor
• Computer and other office equipment
• Electrical items such as fridges and air conditioners

The information to record about each of these items may include:

• Description of the item
• Brand, make or model
• Serial number
• Purchase value
• Purchase date
• Location of the item
• Warranty information
• Invoices

Creating an asset register

As previously mentioned, asset registers are really just a list of items so the creation of them doesn’t need to be overly complex.  There are a number of template examples which can be found through internet searches. 

However, the challenging aspect of creating an asset register is being sure the information you have on there is detailed and correct.  It’s therefore recommended that businesses use their accountant to assist with this task.

Download pdf here